So what? (part 1)
- Strongly suggests redundant storage of information.
- Non-redundant storage is possible, but unlikely.
- Storage is cheap, and "wasting" space can be justified
sometimes.
- But the redundancy is at least questionable because of this
waste.
So what? (part 2)
- If Elvis Costello gets a new website, all 11 rows have to be updated.
- This is obviously slower than updating 1 row.